Test Item 2

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet

Stakeholders are all persons and groups affected by a system, as well as all those directly interested or involved in the product. Stakeholders are invited to Review meetings at all levels and can optionally be invited to Backlog Refinement meetings to explain their requirements.

To identify stakeholders, the P4 framework uses two different life cycles as conceptual guidelines. These are:

  • the product life Cycle (from the idea to the end of product maintenance) and
  • the single item life Cycle (from purchase of raw material to recycling)

For each product or system, the different stakeholders (= interest groups) can be identified from these.

Product life cycle

Item life cycle

The P4 framework distinguishes between three groups of stakeholders, which are assigned to the three areas

Other stakeholders

In addition to the "direct" stakeholders, other, "more general" stakeholders are usually defined in requirements management. These are, for example

  • the society, consisting of public and government organizations
  • the environment (mostly affected by emissions and waste)
  • competitors

In the P4 framework, these stakeholders are not represented by Stakeholder Needs, but by specific goals (e.g. to describe the competitive situation) or they are represented by norms and standards in the area of Quality Attributes & Constraints (QA&C).

Stakeholder map

A Stakeholder map shows the various stakeholders with their needs and the strength of their influence on the team or system.

.

The Team Calendar shows the availability of the Nucleus and Extended Team members for an Iteration. Each Team Member enters planned absences in order to determine the gross capacity of the team before (or at the latest in) the Iteration Planning. The gros capacity is used to adjust the  work forecast by relating it to the team's Velocity, which significantly improves predictability.

Example of a Team Calendar

The concept of a calendar to determine the gros capacity can also be used for Clusters and cycles, ideally based on public holidays and the longer-term vacation planning of the team members .

If the team does not work with iterations but continuously by means of Kanban, the team calendar is maintained for several weeks in advance on a weekly basis.

End

Test Title

This is a test.

A Cluster within the product development Organization is managed by a group of managers. It consists of at least the following roles:

Other management roles complement the Management Circle depending on the type and orientation of the Cluster.

 

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet

Stakeholders are all persons and groups affected by a system, as well as all those directly interested or involved in the product. Stakeholders are invited to Review meetings at all levels and can optionally be invited to Backlog Refinement meetings to explain their requirements.

To identify stakeholders, the P4 framework uses two different life cycles as conceptual guidelines. These are:

  • the product life Cycle (from the idea to the end of product maintenance) and
  • the single item life Cycle (from purchase of raw material to recycling)

For each product or system, the different stakeholders (= interest groups) can be identified from these.

Product life cycle

Item life cycle

The P4 framework distinguishes between three groups of stakeholders, which are assigned to the three areas

Other stakeholders

In addition to the "direct" stakeholders, other, "more general" stakeholders are usually defined in requirements management. These are, for example

  • the society, consisting of public and government organizations
  • the environment (mostly affected by emissions and waste)
  • competitors

In the P4 framework, these stakeholders are not represented by Stakeholder Needs, but by specific goals (e.g. to describe the competitive situation) or they are represented by norms and standards in the area of Quality Attributes & Constraints (QA&C).

Stakeholder map

A Stakeholder map shows the various stakeholders with their needs and the strength of their influence on the team or system.

.

The Team Calendar shows the availability of the Nucleus and Extended Team members for an Iteration. Each Team Member enters planned absences in order to determine the gross capacity of the team before (or at the latest in) the Iteration Planning. The gros capacity is used to adjust the  work forecast by relating it to the team's Velocity, which significantly improves predictability.

Example of a Team Calendar

The concept of a calendar to determine the gros capacity can also be used for Clusters and cycles, ideally based on public holidays and the longer-term vacation planning of the team members .

If the team does not work with iterations but continuously by means of Kanban, the team calendar is maintained for several weeks in advance on a weekly basis.

End

sdfsdfsdfsdfsdfsd.

End.

Mapping SAFe to P4

Das Scaled Agile Framework und P4 sind sich relativ ähnlich. Auf dieser Seite wollen wir die Begriffe der beiden Frameworks gegenüberstellen und übersetzen, wo möglich.

SAFe Abk. P4 Abk. Beschreibung
Agile Release Train ART Cluster Gruppe von Teams (Team-of-Teams), die eine gemeinsame Verantwortung haben, z.B. eine Produktlinie. Sie wird manchmal als auch als “Value Stream” bezeichnet
Program Increment PI Cycle Große Timebox (meist 10-12 Wochen), die in Iterationen/Sprints unterteilt wird
Release Train Engineer RTE Cluster Scrum Master CSM
Program Backlog Cluster Backlog
System Demo Cluster Review
Product Management Cluster Product Owner CPO
System Architect/Engineer Cluster System Engineer CSE
Enterprise Architect Portfolio Architect PFA
Enterprise Management Portfolio Owner PFO
Improvement Stories Improvement Backlog Items IBI
Lean Agile Center of Excellence LACE CSMG or Organization Excellence Group OEG Die Cluster-Scrum-Master-Group bildet den Zusammenschluss aller (Cluster-) Scrum-Master der Organisation

Standing on the shoulders of Giants

Taiichi Ohno: Toyota Production System (TPS), Lean Production, Just-in-time (JIT) & the Toyota Product Development System (TPDS)

Eliyahu M. Goldratt: Theory of Constraints (ToC), Critical Chain & bottleneck theory: Goldratt has shown, that all processes that have “dependent events” and “statistical fluctuations” in their flow, will always have a bottleneck. He showed us how to use the bottleneck to increase the performance (through-put) while minimizing flow-time (time-to-market). ToC is very good suited for processes that are repeated, as in production or as repeated steps within Product Development (e.g. testing). ToC has its limits when the area of development gets more uncertain, more complex und thus unplannable. Here, short time-boxed iterative, incremental and self-organized, adaptive approaches (such as Scrum) are better suited.

W. Edwards Demming: Systems Thinking, PDCA cycle

Peter F. Drucker: Knowledge Work and self-organized teams

Peter M. Senge: Systems Thinking as the “Fifth Discipline”

Allen C. Ward: Knowledge-based Product Development, Visible Knowledge, Lean Product and Process Development (LPPD).