Organisation Improvement Backlog

The Improvement Backlog is the planning and structuring tool of the Scrum Master. There are Improvement Backlogs on all three levels of the P4 framework (Team, Cluster, Organization).

Each Team that identifies more improvements than can currently be implemented stores these improvements in their Team Improvement Backlog, which the Team Scrum Master prioritizes with the Team .

The sum of the improvements of a Cluster is located in the Cluster Improvement Backlog , which the Cluster Scrum Master prioritizes with the Team Scrum Master Group . The Cluster Improvement Backlog is mostly fed by the Teams’ suggestions for improvement.

The total of an Organization’s improvements is in the Organization Improvement Backlog, which the Organization Scrum Master prioritizes with the Cluster Scrum Master Group . The Organization Improvement Backlog is mostly fed from the Cluster’s suggestions for improvement.

.

 

\r\n


Further suitable links:

Events Roles Groups Artifacts
Portfolio Planning

Organisation Sync

Portfolio Refinement

Portfolio Review

Organisation Retrospective

Portfolio Owner

Portfolio Architect

Organisation Scrum Master

Cluster Product Owner Group

Cluster System Engineer Group

Cluster Scrum Master Group

Organisation Management Circle

Team Improvement Backlog

.

Cluster Improvement Backlog

.

Portfolio Backlog

Systems & Applications

System Platforms & Variants

Organisation DoD

Cluster Improvement Backlog

The Improvement Backlog is the planning and structuring tool of the Scrum Master. There are Improvement Backlogs on all three levels of the P4 framework (Team, Cluster, Organization).

Each Team that identifies more improvements than can currently be implemented stores these improvements in their Team Improvement Backlog , which the  Team Scrum Master prioritizes with the Team .

The sum of the improvements of a Cluster is located in the Cluster Improvement Backlog, which the Cluster Scrum Master prioritizes with the Team Scrum Master Group . The Cluster Improvement Backlog is mostly fed by the Teams’ suggestions for improvement.

The total of an Organization’s improvements is in the Organization Improvement backlog , which the Organization Scrum Master prioritizes with the Cluster Scrum Master Group . The Organization Improvement Backlog is mostly fed from the cluster’s suggestions for improvement.

.

 

\r\n


Further suitable links:

Events Roles Groups Artifacts
Cluster Planning

Cluster Sync

Cluster Backlog Refinement

Cluster Review

Cluster Retrospective

Cluster Product Owner

Cluster System Engineer

Cluster Scrum Master

Team Product Owner Group

Team System Engineer Group

Team Scrum Master Group

Cluster Management Circle

Team Improvement Backlog

.

Cluster Backlog

Usable Knowledge & System Increment

Cluster DoD

.

Organisation Improvement Backlog

Cluster Backlog

Each Cluster has exactly one Backlog for its area of ​​responsibility and tasks , the Cluster Backlog. In its simplest form, it consists of elements of just one System development that all Teams in the Cluster are working on. In this case, the Cluster Backlog can be referred to as the System Backlog. If the Cluster is responsible for several systems, all backlog elements of the different systems are contained within the Cluster Backlog.

The Team Product Owner Group is responsible for and prioritizes the Cluster Backlog .The Team Product Owner Group consists of all Team Product Owners of the Cluster and the Cluster Product Owners. A large part of the Cluster Backlog is derived by the Cluster Product Owner Group and the Cluster System Engineer Group from the Portfolio Backlog by refinement in the Portfolio Backlog Refinements .

The other part of the Cluster Backlog consists of work and measures that the Cluster carries out to improve the quality of work and results, e.g.

  • Quality measures and improvement of the Cluster process (ie the Cluster Improvement Backlog)
  • Maintenance of the products, systems and Modules responsible for the cluster
  • Maintenance and servicing of tools and tools.

In order to make the working speed of the Clusters more predictable, the proportion of backlog items derived from the Portfolio Backlog should be relatively stable over time.

The Cluster Backlog is prioritized by the Cluster Product Owner.

In the Cluster Backlog Refinement , the Cluster Backlog Items are presented by the Cluster Product Owner and estimated by the Team System Engineer Group (TSEG). Since this consists of members of all Teams in the Cluster, this group is best suited for this.

In the Cluster Planning,  the TSEG pulls as many Cluster Backlog Items into the Cycle as the TSEG believes due to the previous working speed of the cluster. This is the Cycle Backlog that represents the plan for the next cycle.

Work in cycles or in continuous Kanban mode

Clusters have the choice of planning, executing and controlling their work in a rhythm of fixed time units, ie in Cycles, or in a continuous flow, with each Backlog item individually going through the different states of the work process of the Cluster. This is made transparent on a Kanban board.

A Cluster chooses between Cycle-mode and Kanban-mode, depending on the product and how planning and approval are carried out. With a regular release rhythm, for example every three months, work in Cycles is recommended.

Cycle Backlog

The Cycle Backlog reflects the work of a Cluster for a currently running Cycle . The estimated work, ie backlog elements, is pulled into the Cycle Backlog by the TSEG at the beginning of the Cycle (pull) and thus scheduled for the next Cycle (forecast).

Cluster Kanban

If the Cluster works in Kanban-mode, it uses a Cluster Kanban Board instead of the Cycle Backlog. The first column corresponds to the Cluster Backlog and the last column to the status “Done”. All other columns are defined by the Team Scrum Master Group of the cluster, according to the internal Cluster work process.

.

 

\r\n


Further suitable links:

Events Roles Groups Artifacts
Cluster Planning

Cluster Sync

Cluster Backlog Refinement

Cluster Review

Cluster Retrospective

Cluster Product Owner

Cluster System Engineer

Cluster Scrum Master

Team Product Owner Group

Team System Engineer Group

Team Scrum Master Group

Cluster Management Circle

Team Backlog

.

Usable Knowledge & System Increment

Cluster DoD

Cluster Improvement Backlog

.

Portfolio Backlog

 

Team Backlog, Iteration Backlog & Team Kanban

Team Backlog

Each Team has exactly one Backlog for its area of ​​responsibility and tasks . It consists in the finest level of granularity of Team Goals for the Team. The Team Product Owner is  responsible for and prioritizes the Team Backlog . A large part of the Team Backlog is derived by the Team Product Owner Group and the Team System Engineer Group from the Cluster Backlog , or the System Backlogs by refinement of the entries.

The other part of the Team Backlog consists of work and measures that the team carries out to improve the quality of work and results, e.g.

  • Quality measures and improvement of the team process from the team’s Improvement Backlog
  • Maintenance of the products, systems and Modules responsible for the team
  • Maintenance and servicing of tools and tools.

In order to make the team’s working speed more predictable, the proportion of backlog entries derived from the Cluster Backlog should be relatively stable over time (e.g. 80% of the team’s capacity).

The Team Backlog is prioritized by the Team Product Owner.

In Team Backlog Refinement , the Team Backlog Items are presented by the Team Product Owner and estimated by the Working Team.

In Team Planning, the Working Team pulls as many Team Backlog Items as the it believes it can handle due to its previous speed of work. This is the Iteration Backlog, which is the plan for the next Iteration.

Work in iterations or in continuous Kanban-mode

Teams have the choice of planning, executing and controlling their work in a rhythm of fixed time units, ie in Iterations, or in a continuous flow, with each Backlog Item individually going through the different states of the team’s work process. This is then made transparent on a Kanban Board.

As a rule, teams that provide a service for other teams (Service Teams) work with Kanban, since new work can be planned and started at any time, and finished work can be delivered at any time.

Iteration Backlog

The Iteration Backlog reflects the work of a Team for a currently running iteration. The planned work, reflected by backlog elements, is pulled into the Iteration Backlog by the Working Team at the start of the Iteration, which is referred to as Pull.

Team Kanban

If the Team works in Kanban-mode, it uses a Team Kanban Board instead of the Iteration Backlog. The first column corresponds to the Team Backlog and the last column to the status “Done”. All other columns are defined by the Team, according to the team’s internal work process.

 

\r\n


Further suitable links:

Events Roles Groups Artifacts
Team Planning

Team Sync

Team Backlog Refinement

Team Review

Team Retrospective

Team Product Owner

Team System Engineer

Team Scrum Master

Working Team Inspectable Results

Team DoD

Team Improvement Backlog

.

Cluster Backlog

.

Portfolio Backlog

 

Team Improvement Backlog

The Improvement Backlog is the planning and structuring tool of the Scrum Master. There are Improvement Backlogs on all three levels of the P4 framework (Team, Cluster , Organization ).

Each Team that identifies more Improvements than can currently be implemented stores these Improvements in their Team Improvement Backlog, which the  Team Scrum Master prioritizes with the Team .

The sum of the Improvements of a Cluster is located in the Cluster Improvement Backlog , which the Cluster Scrum Master prioritizes with the Team Scrum Master Group . The Cluster Improvement Backlog is mostly fed by the teams’ suggestions for Improvement.

The total of an organization’s improvements is in the Organization Improvement Backlog , which the Organization Scrum Master prioritizes with the Cluster Scrum Master Group . The Organization Improvement Backlog is mostly fed from the cluster’s suggestions for Improvement.

 

\r\n


Further suitable links:

Events Roles Groups Artifacts
Team Planning

Team Retrospective

Team Scrum Master Working Team Team Backlog

Inspectable Results

Team DoD

.

Cluster Improvement Backlog

.

Organisation Improvement Backlog

 

Team Retrospective

The Team Retrospective gives the team the opportunity to review themselves and to identify and plan improvements in the way they work for the upcoming iteration . It takes place between the Team Review and the next iteration planning. For a four-week iteration, an upper limit of three hours is set. The meeting is usually shorter for shorter iterations. The Scrum Master ensures that the meeting takes place and that all participants understand its purpose. The Scrum Master ensures that the meeting is constructive and productive. The Scrum Master teaches everyone how to adhere to the time frame (time box). Due to its responsibility for the P4 process, the Scrum Master takes part in the Team Retrospective as an equal member. The Team Retrospective is being held to …

  • to review how the past iteration was in terms of people, relationships, processes, infrastructure and tools involved;
  • identify the most important and possible improvements and put them in order; and
  • create a plan for implementing improvements to the way the team works.

The Scrum Master encourages the team to improve their development processes and practices within the P4 framework to work more effectively and satisfactorily in the upcoming iteration. In each Team Retrospective, the team works out ways to improve result quality by adapting the processes accordingly or by defining-of-done, provided these changes are appropriate and do not conflict with product or company standards. At the end of the Team Retrospective, the team should have identified improvements for the upcoming iteration. The implementation of these improvements in the next iteration is the adaptation effort for self-examination of the team.

In the meantime, there are many methodological approaches and questions for the course of the Team Retrospective, e.g.

  • Glad, Sad, Mad
  • Keep, change, puzzled
  • Good, problems, questions
  • Start, stop, keep, more, less

There are many more ideas and suggestions under Fun Retrospectives or Retromat .

.

\r\n


Further suitable links:

Events Roles Groups Artifacts
Team Planning

Team Sync

Team Backlog Refinement

Team Review

.

Cluster Retrospective

.

Organisation Retrospective

Team Product Owner

Team System Engineer

Team Scrum Master

Working Team

Community of Practice

Team Backlog

Inspectable Results

Team DoD

Team Improvement Backlog